• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 70 (2025)
Volume Volume 69 (2024)
Volume Volume 68 (2023)
Volume Volume 67 (2022)
Volume Volume 66 (2021)
Volume Volume 65 (2020)
Volume Volume 64 (2019)
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 63 (2018)
Volume Volume 62 (2017)
Volume Volume 61 (2016)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
A. Seiam, M., E. Nashed, M., A M, O., Sayed, M. (2019). Productivity and Physiological Response of Fodder Beet to Drip Irrigation Regimes and Potassium Levels Under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 64(6), 439-458. doi: 10.21608/alexja.2019.90874
Mofeeda A. Seiam; Mary E. Nashed; Osman A M; M.A. Sayed. "Productivity and Physiological Response of Fodder Beet to Drip Irrigation Regimes and Potassium Levels Under Calcareous Soil Conditions". Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 64, 6, 2019, 439-458. doi: 10.21608/alexja.2019.90874
A. Seiam, M., E. Nashed, M., A M, O., Sayed, M. (2019). 'Productivity and Physiological Response of Fodder Beet to Drip Irrigation Regimes and Potassium Levels Under Calcareous Soil Conditions', Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 64(6), pp. 439-458. doi: 10.21608/alexja.2019.90874
A. Seiam, M., E. Nashed, M., A M, O., Sayed, M. Productivity and Physiological Response of Fodder Beet to Drip Irrigation Regimes and Potassium Levels Under Calcareous Soil Conditions. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019; 64(6): 439-458. doi: 10.21608/alexja.2019.90874

Productivity and Physiological Response of Fodder Beet to Drip Irrigation Regimes and Potassium Levels Under Calcareous Soil Conditions

Article 6, Volume 64, Issue 6, December 2019, Page 439-458  XML PDF (1.75 MB)
DOI: 10.21608/alexja.2019.90874
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mofeeda A. Seiam1; Mary E. Nashed2; Osman A M3; M.A. Sayed3
1Forage Crops Res. Department, field crop institute, A.R.C, Egypt Email, Mofedaseiam @ yahoo. Com.
2Crop physiology Res .Department, Field crops institute, A.R.C., Egypt Email, nashed.henen.4@ Gmail. Com.
3Water Requirements &field irrigation Dept., Soil, water and Environment RES. Institute. ARC, Egypt.
Receive Date: 20 May 2020,  Accept Date: 20 May 2020 
Abstract
A field trait was conducted at Nubaria Agricultural Research Station, EL-Behira Governorate, Egypt during two winter successive growing seasons of 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 on fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) variety Voro-shenger. The aim was to study the effect of three drip irrigation regimes i.e. Irrigation with amount of water equal 100% (I1), 80% (I2) and 60 %( I3) of potential evapotranspiration (ETp) and potassium fertilization at rates of 0, 57.12, 114.24 and 171.36 Kg K2O/ha.
Results of combining analysis revealed that increasing irrigation levels led to significant increase in crop growth rate (CGR) at (90-120) and (120-150) DAS, leaves and root fresh weight Kg/plant, leaves and root dry weight g/plant, root length and diameter as well as root, total yield ton/ha and total chlorophyll of leaves. Dry treatments significantly reduced the percentage of potassium (K %), crud protein (CP %), digestive crud protein (DCP %) and crud fiber (CF %). Whereas, the percentage of total soluble solid (TSS %) and total digestible nutrients (TDN %) significantly increased. The maximum percentage of Relative water content (RWC %) was obtained from wet treat-ment, while medium treatment at 80% of ETp give the maximum values of water utilization efficiency (WUtE).
Adding 171.36 KgK2O/ha significantly increased CGR at (90-120) and (120-150) DAS, Leaves fresh weight Kg/plant, leaves and root dry weight, root length and diameter, root and foliage yields as well as total yield ton/ha, total chlorophyll of leaves, DCP% and K%. While adding 171.36 and 114.3 KgK2O/ha significantly increased root fresh weight Kg/plant, CP% and CF% with insignificant difference. However, TDN% decreased by increasing potas-sium fertilization. Maximum RWC% and WUtE were obtained when plants received 171.36 KgK2O/ha.
The interaction between irrigation regimes and potassium fertilization levels had significant effect on all traits under study except CGR at (90-120) DAS, root diameter, foliage yield ton/fed, total chlorophyll of leaves, K% and TSS%. The highest values of CGR (120-190), Leaves Fresh weight Kg/plant, leaves and root dry weight g/plant, CP%, CF% as well as DCP% and RWC were achieved from wet treatment (100% of ETp) in combination with 171.36 KgK2O/ha. While irrigation with 100%, 80% of ETp and 171.36 KgK2O/ha gave the highest values for root length, root and total yield ton/ha as well as WUtE with insignificant difference. However irrigation with 100% of ETp combined with 114.24 and 171.36 have the highest values for root fresh weight Kg/plant with insignificant dif-ference. The maximum TDN% obtained from dry treatment (60% of ETp) without potassium fertilization.
According to profitability assessment, the highest net income and investment ratio as an average of two growing seasons were obtained when plants watered by amount of water equal 80% of ETp and received 171.36 KgK2O/ha.
Keywords
Fodder beet; Regime irrigation; Potassium levels; Growth; Forage yields and quality; Water uti; lization efficiency
Supplementary Files
download Banger.pdf
Statistics
Article View: 215
PDF Download: 537
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.