• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 70 (2025)
Volume Volume 69 (2024)
Volume Volume 68 (2023)
Volume Volume 67 (2022)
Volume Volume 66 (2021)
Volume Volume 65 (2020)
Volume Volume 64 (2019)
Volume Volume 63 (2018)
Volume Volume 62 (2017)
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 61 (2016)
Volume Volume 60 (2015)
EL-Gaafarey, T. (2017). Line × Tester Analysis of Forage Yield and Plant Chraters of Forage Sorghum. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62(2), 223-235. doi: 10.21608/alexja.2017.5778
T.G. EL-Gaafarey. "Line × Tester Analysis of Forage Yield and Plant Chraters of Forage Sorghum". Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62, 2, 2017, 223-235. doi: 10.21608/alexja.2017.5778
EL-Gaafarey, T. (2017). 'Line × Tester Analysis of Forage Yield and Plant Chraters of Forage Sorghum', Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 62(2), pp. 223-235. doi: 10.21608/alexja.2017.5778
EL-Gaafarey, T. Line × Tester Analysis of Forage Yield and Plant Chraters of Forage Sorghum. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017; 62(2): 223-235. doi: 10.21608/alexja.2017.5778

Line × Tester Analysis of Forage Yield and Plant Chraters of Forage Sorghum

Article 2, Volume 62, Issue 2, April 2017, Page 223-235  XML
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/alexja.2017.5778
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
T.G. EL-Gaafarey*
Forage Crop Res. Dept. Field Crop Res.Inst., ARC, Egypt
Receive Date: 28 March 2018,  Accept Date: 28 March 2018 
Abstract
This study was conducted at Sakha Agric. Res. Station, A.R.C. during 2015 and 2016 seasons. Five lines (1- TX2-2, 2-
TX3042, 3- 2002-39, 4- 2002-41 and 5- ICS 693) and three testers (1- Piper, 2- Giza1 and 3-Port said) were crossed in line x
testers analysis to investigate combing ability in forage sorghum which had fifteen genotypes of fodder sorghum were used in
this investigation for yield and yield components. Interaction between line and tester was significant for most studied traits.
Mean performance of evaluated top crosses were significantly superior in total fresh yield (kg/plot) were (2002-41x Giza1)
and (Ics 693x Port said) 131.7 and 131.7 kg.plot-1, respectively, besides the significance superiority of the hybrids (TX3042 x
Port said). General combining ability effects (G.C.A) for lines and tester results indicated that line (Ics 693) was among the
best combiner for fresh forage yield and the total yield. The line TX3042, showed significant elite combing ability for dry
forage yield and total dry yield. As for testers, Giza1 was the best combiner for fresh forage yield and total fresh yield.
Specific combing ability effects (SCA) for the fifteen studied crosses were significant positive Also, TX2-2x Piper exhibited
positive significant (SCA) for dry forage yield of the second cutting and total dry yield .The highest significant positive
(SCA) effects were expressed by the hybrid TX3042 x Port said for fresh forage yield of all three cuttings and total yield. In
addition, the hybrid 2002-41x Giza1 showed significant positive (SCA) effects for fresh yield and the total green yield.
Finally, it seems that the contribution of line specific effects was more important than the general effects of lines and testers.
Top crosses 2002-41x Giza1and Ics 693x Port said conceder as the best crosses under this study, so using it in breeding
program for high yielding (total fresh yield and total dry yield) would be useful.
Keywords
General combing Ability (GCA); Specific combing Ability (SCA); Sorghum; Forage yield; Relative contribution
Statistics
Article View: 211
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.